While there are vestiges of monetarism (as there are vestiges of other old schools), modern research and practice generally falls under "New Classical", "New Keynesian", and "Growth". There is also considerable overlap.
there is still research in monetary and fiscal policies, of course.
Check out David Romer's Advanced Macroeconomics (the standard textbook for first year PhD students) to see. Blanchard's text (don't have that near right now) also sketches where econ is these days.
And foorth they passe, with pleasure forward led, Ioying to heare the birdes sweete harmony, Which therein shrouded from the tempest dred, Seemd in their song to scorne the cruell sky. -- Edmund Spenser, The Faerie Queene, Canto I
Any original material posted on the Ab Ovo Usque Ad Mala blog is the copyrighted property of its author(s). It may be freely distributed for non-profit educational purposes with the permission of the author(s).
3 comments:
what do you mean?
srsly - I don't understand what you're driving at here. "Monetarism" as a main branch of economics has been kicked away......
Not according to some.
yes it has.
don't confuse monetarism with monetary policy.
While there are vestiges of monetarism (as there are vestiges of other old schools), modern research and practice generally falls under "New Classical", "New Keynesian", and "Growth". There is also considerable overlap.
there is still research in monetary and fiscal policies, of course.
Check out David Romer's Advanced Macroeconomics (the standard textbook for first year PhD students) to see. Blanchard's text (don't have that near right now) also sketches where econ is these days.
Post a Comment