What the heck is the deal with trying to jam Leo Strauss into some neo-conservative framework? To me that is a very problematic association at best (at least as I understand neo-conservatism). Needless to say it bugs the heck out of me.
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Anne Norton's Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire is an interesting look at how so many people have come to conflate Strauss, Straussians, and neoconservatives (though the book is more of a gossipy polemical than academic study).
I'd say at the very least that Strauss would have been quite skeptical of many of the claims made by "neo-conservatives," and he would have likely found the notion of "nation-building" to be the sort of hubristic notion that gets people into trouble.
And foorth they passe, with pleasure forward led, Ioying to heare the birdes sweete harmony, Which therein shrouded from the tempest dred, Seemd in their song to scorne the cruell sky. -- Edmund Spenser, The Faerie Queene, Canto I
Any original material posted on the Ab Ovo Usque Ad Mala blog is the copyrighted property of its author(s). It may be freely distributed for non-profit educational purposes with the permission of the author(s).
2 comments:
Anne Norton's Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire is an interesting look at how so many people have come to conflate Strauss, Straussians, and neoconservatives (though the book is more of a gossipy polemical than academic study).
I'd say at the very least that Strauss would have been quite skeptical of many of the claims made by "neo-conservatives," and he would have likely found the notion of "nation-building" to be the sort of hubristic notion that gets people into trouble.
Post a Comment